Moat
Economic Moat · Competitive Advantage
A durable competitive advantage that protects a company from competition and allows it to maintain high profitability over the long term.
What it is
The concept was introduced by Warren Buffett — an analogy to the castle moat that protects the castle (business) from attackers (competition).
Most common sources of moat:
- →Switching costs — high costs of switching to a competitor
- →Network effects — the more users, the more valuable the product
- →Intangible assets (brand) — strong brand, patents, licenses
- →Cost advantages — structurally lower costs (scalability)
- →Efficient scale — natural monopoly in a given area
Moat is measured by width (how strong?) and durability (how long will it last?).
Brand as a moat source: A strong brand allows charging a premium for a comparable product (see pricing power) and reduces customer acquisition costs — people actively seek the brand rather than needing expensive selling. Brand strength can be measured indirectly: premium price vs. the generic equivalent, repeat purchase rate without discount incentive, and how long a position holds even after a cheaper competitor enters. Brand is the most vulnerable form of moat — unlike switching costs or network effects with structural/mechanical protection, reputation can be damaged by a single scandal or series of quality failures.
Why track it
A company without a moat is threatened by profit erosion — once competitors spot it, they will arrive and compress margins. A company with a deep moat can sustain above-average ROIC for decades.
When analyzing, look for concrete evidence of moat: ability to raise prices without losing customers (pricing power), low churn, ROIC consistently above WACC.
Real-world example
Microsoft: Moat score 70/90 (analysis across 9 dimensions). Strongest dimension: Switching Costs (9/10) — enterprise customers have data, workflows, and integrations deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem.
“Time is the friend of the wonderful business, the enemy of the mediocre.”