Moat
Economic Moat · Competitive Advantage
A durable competitive advantage that protects a company from competition and allows it to maintain high profitability over the long term.
What it is
The concept was introduced by Warren Buffett, an analogy to the castle moat that protects the castle (business) from attackers (competition).
Most common sources of moat:
- →Switching costs: high costs of switching to a competitor
- →Network effects: the more users, the more valuable the product
- →Intangible assets (brand), strong brand, patents, licenses
- →Cost advantages: structurally lower costs (scalability)
- →Efficient scale: natural monopoly in a given area
Moat is measured by width (how strong?) and durability (how long will it last?).
Brand as a moat source: A strong brand allows charging a premium for a comparable product (see pricing power) and reduces customer acquisition costs, people actively seek the brand rather than needing expensive selling. Brand strength can be measured indirectly: premium price vs. the generic equivalent, repeat purchase rate without discount incentive, and how long a position holds even after a cheaper competitor enters. Brand is the most vulnerable form of moat, unlike switching costs or network effects with structural/mechanical protection, reputation can be damaged by a single scandal or series of quality failures.
Why track it
A company without a moat is threatened by profit erosion, once competitors spot it, they will arrive and compress margins. A company with a deep moat can sustain above-average ROIC for decades.
When analyzing, look for concrete evidence of moat: ability to raise prices without losing customers (pricing power), low churn, ROIC consistently above WACC.
Real-world example
Microsoft: Moat score 70/90 (analysis across 9 dimensions). Strongest dimension: Switching Costs (9/10), enterprise customers have data, workflows, and integrations deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem.
“Time is the friend of the wonderful business, the enemy of the mediocre.”